The Galaxy S3 has a plastic body with a removable back plate that is so flexible you could probably touch the sides together without breaking it.
When the phone is all snapped together, it is light and feels rather fragile. The Galaxy S3 has a slight curve to the handset, and it flexes a bit if you apply pressure in the corners. The LG Nexus 4 is also made of plastic, but with glass on both sides of the device. The Nexus 4, a completely flat slab. LG and Samsung have both opted to use quad-core processors in their top of the line.
The processor in the Nexus 4 is clocked ever so slightly higher than the Galaxy S3, and in benchmarks comparing the two processors the Snapdragon routinely outperformed the Exynos chip, though never by any significant margin. When it comes to straight out raw performance, the Snapdragon-powered Galaxy S3 is not as powerful as the Nexus 4, but you are unlikely to ever be in a situation with your smartphone where that difference will matter. LG takes this round.see url
Google Nexus 4 v Samsung Galaxy S III
Samsung is known as one of the best when it comes to their smartphone screens, and both Samsung and LG make fantastic displays for televisions. The Nexus 4 is capable of delivering a quality experience… right until you try to use it outdoors.
All of a sudden the cameras on our smartphones are no longer luxuries. In fact, a quality camera alone can be the deciding factor in purchasing a smartphone today.
Google Nexus 4 vs. Samsung Galaxy S3: In-depth comparison | Digital Trends
Both smartphones feature LEDs for flash as well. The LG lens and flash lay flush against the phone with the same glass that coats the back of the phone covering the camera.
When comparing the quality of the photos that are taken between these two phones, Samsung generally comes out on top. Either way, while casually shooting the photos from the Galaxy S3 look a lot nicer but the Nexus 4 compensates by offering an entire photo studio, powered by Nik Software which Google recently acquired , to allow you to improve the image quality. I would consider this a tie. This is very much a personal preference issue. Of the two, the Galaxy S3 is the only on that allows you to swap the batteries out or install a larger battery if you feel you need it.
Despite both having mAh batteries and both having multi-core processors that are supposed to be economical in their battery usage, the Galaxy S3 manages to get two more hours of usage than the Nexus 4. Samsung gets the point here.
Physical Build and Design
Not all versions of Android are created equally. The Samsung Galaxy S3 has recently been updated to Android 4. The Pixel 3 design easily lags behind Samsung's. So, it takes the lead in protection as well. For ports and slots, the Galaxy S9 just gets further ahead. Both phones include fingerprint scanners, but Samsung goes further by also offering facial recognition and iris scanning. The displays just set the two phones even further apart. The Pixel 3 fits a 5. It has an Everything is stepped up on the Galaxy S9.
There's a fair bit of similarity between the two phones here. The Galaxy S9 will likely be getting the new operating system next year. That said, the Google's own phones will always get software updates sooner than 3rd party manufactured handsets.
The base storage for each is also 64GB, with upgrades to GB available on both. However, the S9 internal storage can be configured as high as GB, and microSD card support allows for even more storage beyond that.
However, neither should struggle to get all-day performance. And, wireless charging is an option on both phones. The fairly even match-up here makes it tough to call, but Samsung's more flexible storage and ability to power a desktop-like experience though Dex may give it an edge for some customers.
Both Samsung and Google know how to make a great smartphone camera. The wide aperture combined with 1. The rear camera also has optical image stabilization OIS , and can record video in 4K at up to 60fps or in p at fps. The Pixel 3 rear camera is worse on paper. It has a It does offer optical and electronic image stabilization, but its video capabilities are limited, only hitting 30fps for 4K and fps for p.
However, Google has shown its might in AI-powered image processing, so it may still pull ahead in image quality.
Related google news 4 vs samsung galaxy s3
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved